In FOP we left them be. I, too, prefer moving the branches to a subdirectory. After all when you delete a branch, how do you know that a certain branch ever existed (looking at the HEAD revision only)? In SVN, it's a little difficult. It's better to let them live especially since they don't take up additional space like with CVS. Deleting short-lived, unimportant branches is ok, though.
On 22.05.2006 13:34:11 thomas.deweese wrote: > Hi Cameron, > > Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/22/2006 01:48:35 AM: > > > Anyone know what > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/batik/branches/apache/ is? > > It looks like it has some W3C and SAX code, plus some very old Batik > > code. OK to delete? > > It's probably fine to delete (after all it can always be recalled if > needed for some reason). I have a slight preference for creating an > abandoned/dead/pruned directory to move it into but deleting it is > probably fine. > Any idea what other projects do with dead branches? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
