Hi Cameron, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/24/2006 06:39:44 AM:
> I have finished enough of the animation engine that I want to fold it > back into the trunk now. Does it have any regressions in regard? > Everything should be supported except the animation of attributes > whose plain DOM attribute updates wouldn?t have caused a proper > update of the rendering currently anyway (such as animating gradient > element attributes), I actually did a bunch of work on this and got close to a fairly clean solution. I'll see if I can wrap up the work and check it in (at least in a temp branch). I suspect it would need modification to work with the animation engine. > plus one or two other stray attributes (such > as 'use' elements? 'xlink:href' attributes). > > I have been testing along the way, but haven?t done exhaustive tests > yet. Hopefully people can start trying it and point out any problems, > as I try to build up a bunch of test cases to stick into regard. > > If there?s nothing that has raised an eyebrow about the code I?ve been > committing to the anim branch, I?ll merge the changes in to the trunk > tomorrow. I think this is fine. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
