Thomas DeWeese: > Well, so this raises an interesting question. Right now our > code base will compile with either JDK 1.4 or 1.3 but you don't > get the same thing when you do this. Will a JDK 1.4 build run > cleanly on JDK 1.3? I would suspect not since the JGVTComponent > will try and register a scroll wheel event handler which doesn't > exist in JDK 1.3.
You are right, it doesn’t. I wonder how many users of Batik actually need 1.3 support—it must be declining. > This is fine for development/source dist since the build > tools figure this all out for us, but what about when we go > to make a binary distribution? I think it would be fairly ugly to > have two binary distributions (one for JDK 1.3, and one for > JDK 1.4+). Is that commonly done? That’s a good point. We haven’t had a release since that mouse wheel stuff went in there, have we? It seems that FOP have 1.3 and 1.4 versions of their release: http://apache.planetmirror.com/dist/xmlgraphics/fop/ -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
