On 22.01.2007 12:31:57 Cameron McCormack wrote: > Hi Jeremias. > > Jeremias Maerki: > > I've taken a glance at all the legal information that is around. Here > > are my findings: > > > > - NOTICE should be updated to conform to > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > The second paragraph should be ("at" instead of "by"): > > This product includes software developed at > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > Is the s/at/by/ the only change needed to conform? Were the other > paragraphs I put in the file OK?
Yes, I believe so. > > - The license for pdf-transcoder.jar is still 1.1, but should be 2.0. > > Right, ok. > > > - I think it would be good to note in the readme for pdf-transcoder.jar > > that it was derived from the FOP 0.90alpha1 release. This is otherwise > > not apparent, only when you go checking the SVN log: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/lib/pdf-transcoder.jar?view=log > > Ok. > > > - The license info should always indicate the right license version. > > "Apache License" is not enough. Please check all the readme files in lib. > > Checked. > > > - xml-stylebook and crimson are ALv1.1, not 2.0 (as implied by pointing > > to LICENSE in the root directory). Better just list the ALv1.1. > > > > - The README for xml-stylebook should point to > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xml/stylebook/trunk/ > > Ok. I’ve removed xml-stylebook since it’s not needed any more. Even better then. > > Cameron, would it make sense to create a branch for Batik with the goal > > of finishing the integration of XML Graphics Commons (irrespective of > > the Batik release)? That way I don't have to redo the adjustments you > > had to make and therefore I can more easily help you figure out what > > going wrong. Finally, are the problems apparent in any case or are there > > only special cases where the problem shows? Which are those? Thanks! > > Yeah that’s a good idea, better than leaving it sitting around on my > hard drive. I’ve committed my current changes to > …/batik/branches/commons-integration. > > If you open samples/mathMetal.svg with Batik trunk and with that branch, > you will see the colour difference. I think it’s something to do with > filters, but I haven’t really investigated yet. Thanks. I'll take a look ASAP. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
