Shouldn't that be 2008-01-09 instead of 2007-09-01? On 10.01.2008 10:54:34 cam wrote: > Author: cam > Date: Thu Jan 10 01:54:09 2008 > New Revision: 610731 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610731&view=rev > Log: > Update doap file for new release. > > Modified: > xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/documentation-sources/content/doap.rdf > > Modified: xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/documentation-sources/content/doap.rdf > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/documentation-sources/content/doap.rdf?rev=610731&r1=610730&r2=610731&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/documentation-sources/content/doap.rdf (original) > +++ xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/documentation-sources/content/doap.rdf Thu Jan 10 > 01:54:09 2008 > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > <!-- > ======================================================================= > > - Copyright (c) 2006 The Apache Software Foundation. > + Copyright (c) 2006-2007 The Apache Software Foundation. > All rights reserved. > > ======================================================================= > @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@ > <name>Batik 1.7beta1</name> > <created>2007-03-29</created> > <revision>1.7beta1</revision> > + </Version> > + </release> > + <release> > + <Version> > + <name>Batik 1.7</name> > + <created>2007-09-01</created> > + <revision>1.7</revision> > </Version> > </release> > <repository> >
Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
