https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Socheleau <[email protected]> 2009-06-16 13:28:13 PST --- > > Apparently not those two items. ;-) I hope I got it right this time :) > > + for(int k = 0; k < values.size(); k++) > > + { > > + Object baselineValue = values.get(k); > > Could/should the "Object" variable be moved to outside the cycle? Although the > nesting will probably never be more than one level... I moved it outside of the loop > > + //for the child of the element > > Seems that a superfluous (indenting) space slipped into that line. ;-) > you got me! > > I've attached test file for animation and scripting as well for the review. > > Cool, I noticed the attachments but didn't have the chance to test them yet. > Nevertheless, you didn't state whether the patch properly handled those > situations (although you working suggests so). > the scripting and animation test files are working with the patch. Though, I'm still working on some other animations where I don't get what I expect. I'm starting to fix it is a different issue. I'll keep digging... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
