To be somewhat more precise, I am migrating all of test-{resources,sources}
to test/{java,resources} as I progress on the junit upgrade. Once that is
complete, I expect to also move sources/org to src/java/org and
sources/*.{mf,template} to an appropriate location.On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I can see that if you started the Junit migration then moving so many > classes will be a problem. I will instead merge some of the jars. > > > On 12/22/14 4:48 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > the junit work involves pretty much all classes, so indeed it would cause > a big problem to integrate > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Glenn, regarding BATIK-1098, which has to do with cyclic dependencies >> between jars, the approach I followed was to move classes between packages >> to break the dependencies (the other approach would be to cut on the number >> of batik jars, which are indeed too many, and merge some of them). This >> involved moving a lot of classes in the packages with dom.svg, bridge, >> anim, script and gvt in the name. But I am afraid now that this may cause >> major problems with your work when you try to merge to trunk... >> >> What are the batik packages where you are doing your work? >> >> >> On 12/22/14 9:28 AM, Luis Bernardo wrote: >> >> OK, since the goal is really to release FOP 2.0 then I will not cut a RC >> now. But I will fix BATIK-1098. >> >> On 12/21/14 11:57 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> >> There are two items underway that I'd like to be finished before we cut a >> release: >> >> - BATIK-1092 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1092> >> - BATIK-1095 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1095> >> - FOP-2391 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2391> >> >> At a minimum, the Batik work involved in the last one of these needs to >> be finished before we do an FOP 2.0. >> >> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I am planning to push for a Batik release in the coming weeks so that we >>> can aim to also have a release of FOP in the near future. The recent >>> release of XGC was part of this goal. >>> >>> I am currently working on BATIK-1098 which I think needs to be fixed >>> before a release can be considered. After that I plan to build a release >>> candidate and give users some weeks to test before building the final >>> release. Since I do not see any reason to bump the major version I plan to >>> name the release 1.8. >>> >>> In terms of new features the only thing really new compared with 1.7 >>> will be the SVG1.2 color support added by Jeremias. All the rest are bug >>> fixes. >>> >>> Let me know if you have any comments/suggestions/objections. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
