The goal I'm trying to achieve is to make up an SVG DOM tree by making a series of
calls to
SVGGraphics2D. Then while the data for the image is still in the DOM tree (ie still in
the
org.w3c.dom.Document) I'd like to give it to JPEGTranscoder.
In other words, I'd like to avoid the overhead of streaming out the DOM tree. I'd like
to go directly to
JPEG after making all the SVGGraphics2D calls.
It looks like it might be possible to use the Document tree originally given to the
constructor of the
SVGGraphics2D object as the input to the constructor for
org.apache.batik.transcoder.TranscoderInput.
Then it seems like it ought to be possible to call
org.apache.batik.transcoder.image.JPEGTranscoder
object with that TranscoderInput object using the transcode method it inherits from:
org.apache.batik.transcoder.XMLAbstractTranscoder.transcode(TranscoderInput input,
TranscoderOutput output)
First of all, is this supposed to be possible to do?
Secondly, do I need to perform any manipulation to the Document object before giving
it to the
TranscoderInput constructor?
I ask the second question because SVGGraphics2D.stream(Element svgRoot, Writer writer,
boolean
useCss) adds an svgRoot to svgDocument before trying to stream it out. So I'm
wondering whether
adding that would be a good or bad or indifferent thing to do before trying to
generate a JPEG from the
Docuiment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
