>>>>> "f" == florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You may have a problem with the way you are using the rasterizer. I >> just created an example (see attachment) and setting the -dpi >> option does make a difference. f> when i open the resulting tiff in photoshop, the resolution of the f> tiff is still 72. when i change the dpi value to 150 (without f> resampling), the image is 11,99cm wide and heigh.. f> so im wondering why the rastizer doesnt give the resulting image f> the right dpi value right away? We don't set the dpi tags in Tiff. We should, I'll see about fixing this. f> and why the measurements are not 100% correct.. (11,99 cm instead f> of 12 cm) Well first off you have a discrete coordinate system so given that we are doing 150 dpi each pixel is 1/150'th of an inch so since we can only output an integer number of pixels we are likely to be a little over or a little under. Also I noticed we don't round the eventually width/height which would give us a tendency to be low (but we usually can't be right on). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
