>>>>> "GWJ" == G Wade Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GWJ> I think I know the answer already, but I'm going to ask anyway.
GWJ> Overview: I have an application where I will need to display
GWJ> multiple SVG images on top of (or behind) one another. I will
GWJ> also need to manipulate various elements on various images. The
GWJ> some of these layers may be invisible until triggered by a user
GWJ> action.
GWJ> 1. I can generate the visual effect I want with the <image/> element.
GWJ> a. This allows me to load multiple SVG files that I can map to the
GWJ> same space.
GWJ> b. However, I cannot find a way to "reach into" the SVG in the
GWJ> image to manipulate internal elements.
This should be doable. As far as reaching into to sub SVG this
is a pretty small enhancement to the existing DOM. The
BridgeUpdateHandler for the SVGOMImageElement already has a reference
to the referenced document. This would of course be a non-standard
SVG DOM (at least right now).
GWJ> 2. I have seen the <multiImage/>/<subImageRef/> system. It be able to
GWJ> tie loading multiple images depending on zoom.
GWJ> a. I assume that I would have the same manipulation problems as
GWJ> with the <image/> element.
Yes, in fact they would be a bit worse because the way
multiImage is implemented is 'lazy' so normally not all documents are
loaded and also there is no 'one document' associated (in fact I'm not
sure how this would make sense in the context of a central application
tweaking docs since you would have to 'retweak' documents when
resolutions changes).
GWJ> b. The files are supposed to be viewable by other SVG viewers,
GWJ> although the manipulation features are only available in my
GWJ> application. I'm not sure how these elements would play with
GWJ> other viewers.
You can fairly easily use 'switch' and 'requiredExtensions' to
fall back to a standard image element when needed (i.e. anything but
Batik :).
GWJ> 3. There have been a few questions in the past on this list about
GWJ> layering JSVGCanvas objects and displaying one on top of another.
GWJ> a. I don't know if anyone has ever gotten this approach to
GWJ> work.
I've never tried it directly but I do know that transparent
backgrounds work for the JSVGCanvas and this is probably the most
important piece.
GWJ> b. I assume I could just walk a list of documents and manipulate
GWJ> all appropriate elements on each document.
Sure you would have a list of JSVGCanvas's and you can get the
document from them.
GWJ> Does anybody have any other ideas or comments on these ideas?
You might consider building the composite document yourself
(fetch each of the 'sub documents' and build the composite document on
the client). This would solve the 'reaching into' issue and allow you
to only have one JSVGCanvas.
One other issue you might not have considered is that by using
multiple JSVGCanvas's you have the potential advantage that a
modification in on layer would not require all the layers to re-render
(the JSVGCanvas maintains an offscreen buffer which all the other
layers could use).
GWJ> Thanks, G. Wade
GWJ> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
GWJ> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GWJ> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]