In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree this is a bug, but it appears to be in the Mac OS X JVM > not in Batik. It is getting really frustrating to keep hearing this as an excuse for why Batik doesn't work. Even if it's true, it indicates that Batik is archutected to depend on the underlying platform too tightly. Isn't there any hope of something like batik-rasterizer that will produce pixel-for-pixel identical results on all platforms? -- David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/ Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
