"Thomas DeWeese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jim Ley wrote: > > "Thomas DeWeese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> It isn't clear to me which is the > >>lesser of the two evils - not firing the event, or firing the event with > >>the cloned instance as target. > >> > >> Anyone willing to vote on this :) > > > > > > Could you fire it on the USE? > > This would be more difficult actually, and why would you want it? > The target is supposed to be the ElementInstance, I would consider our > 'cloned' instance closer than the use element (which would lose all information > about the actual element receiving the event).
because without an ElementInstance/correspondingUseElement we wouldn't be able to get to the right document? etc. through parentNode etc. or is the cloned tree still really there and navigable up the tree back into the real tree? I'd rather see the event fire, than not, but I'm a little unsure about the whole ElementInstance interface anyway. Jim. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
