"Thomas DeWeese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jim Ley wrote: >> I don't accept that >> Batik is doing the right thing within ECMAScript binding. > > Come on Jim, an error is an error :).
True, but the could point to a deeper problem and I believe it does, because javascript didn't necessarily call (string,string) it may have called (object,object) so you are doing type conversion on some of the parameters passed, why not all? I don't know of an example stating the behaviour is wrong, but the error you're reporting does not exist in ecmascript, ecmascript objects do not throw such an error, the spec doesn't indicate it's an error thrown. I believe usefully setProperty(a,b,null) and setProperty(a,b) should behave identically in an ecmascript binding. ecmascript authors should not need to know if it's a host provided or native javascript object. Jim. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
