Hi, Thomas, Thanks a lot. you were right. I found the problem in my code. Now it gives me some io exception with the invalid file. But it can still be rendered in squiggle. Is there a way to turn the validate on in prepackaged sqiuggle jar file or I have to modify the code then repackage it.
Thanks. Weiming On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 13:40, Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Weiming Zhang wrote: > > > I am new to batik, svg and xml. I have an svg file that can be rendered > > with a simple batik application I wrote. it has: > > > > <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" > > "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd";>. > > > > If I change it to another DTD which I wrote for testing, for example, > > to: > > <!DOCTYPE svg SYSTEM "http://mydomain/DTDs/test.dtd";> > > > > it still can be rendered even with the setValidating(true) on the > > SAXSVGDocumentFactory object. Also the file is actually not valid > > according to the DTD I gave. Could anybody explain to me what is going > > on? I thought batik would validate the document with the dtd I gave at > > the DOCTYPE declaration. > > Hi Weiming, > > I would guess the problem is somewhere in your code as > when I test this everything works. I get an error from Squiggle and > from the rasterizer. What parser are you using? > > Does it fail with the standard DTD? (i.e. is this just a problem > with your custom DTD) > > If you can provide a stand-alone example it might help sort things out > as well. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
