Hi David,

David Austin wrote:

Yes, I assumed that there would be some differences in fonts. However, since I am using a headless configuration, I thought it would
just use a default java font set.

AFAIK this would still include fonts on the system (I know this is the case for Windows). So it is very likely that the 'correct font' is a Windows font you don't have on the Linux PC.

Does Batik use its own fonts?

Not unless you reference them (really the fonts included with Batik are just samples you would really have to do something to reference them. Which points to another solution which would be to create an SVG Font and use that since it should always render the same on any client.

Is there any way I can change this?

I would figure out what font I was actually using on Windows and try and get that font on Linux.



On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:44:59 -0500, Thomas DeWeese
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi David,

  Sounds like the fonts that are installed on the Linux box are
different from the Windows box.

David Austin wrote:


Hello,
 I have a small web application that simply takes an XML-FO file and
converts it into an SVG file using FOP.  Then, the SVG is rasterized
into a jpg image with Batik.  I noticed that there is a big difference
in how the images turn out depending on the OS that the application is
running from.  If it is running on windows, the image looks fine, but
when I use the linux version (headless), the fonts seem to be sized
wrong, and some of the characters show up as question marks in the
image.  Any ideas?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to