Thomas DeWeese wrote:
I seem to be a broken record today, but it works fine for me in 1.6.
Does it really not show for you with a fresh copy of the 1.6 squiggle?
No.. but I'm not surprised. This is probably another JVM font issue
(I've had some in the past).
Is that possibility consistent with what you know about how Batik handles
text with no explicit "font-family" ? What is the "default" font family?
The CSS engine will always provide a font-family. The default font
family comes from the 'CSSContext' which is implemented by the
BridgeUserAgent in the JSVGComponent to return:
"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"
OK I tried playing with font-family="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"...
Turns out that "Helvetica" is the problem. If I remove it, it works.
Apparently I don't have an "Arial" because it doesn't matter whether
"Arial" is there in front of "Helvetica" or not.
Also, if "sans-serif" is first then it always works. That must be
the font I'm actually ending up with when it works (this is with
font-size="10" by the way).
Thanks,
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
