Hi Thomas, I tested it with the latest nightly build with no success. It ist the same result as in 1.6.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sagte: > Hi Thomas, > > here I have a little example which I used to test it. > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <svg width="843.56" height="595.53" viewBox="0 0 843.56 595.53" > overflow="visible" enable-background="new 0 0 843.56 595.53" > xml:space="preserve"> > <g id="Ebene_1" > > <path fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF" stroke-width="0.25" > stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M40.89,20.68"/> > <rect x="20.33" y="13.43" fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF" > stroke-width="0.25" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" > width="39.48" height="8.5"/> > <g> > <rect x="0.13" y="0.13" fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF" > stroke-width="0.25" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" > width="843.31" height="595.28"/> > <rect x="20.47" y="29.56" fill="none" stroke="#000000" width="803.62" > height="515.15"/> > </g> > <line fill="none" stroke="#000000" x1="21.27" y1="173.26" x2="822.27" > y2="173.26"/> > <line fill="none" stroke="#000000" x1="358.27" y1="29.26" x2="358.27" > y2="543.26"/> > </g> > </svg> > > Here the command I used to convert it > java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar -a 20,30,804,516 -bg 255.255.255.255 > -indexed 2 -w 1680 test.svg > I use the same command in 1.5.1 as in 1.6 > > The resulting image are different. In 1.6 there is a larger border > on the top and the bottom. > > I'll try to test it with the current CVS-Version. > > > Thomas DeWeese sagte: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> I don't have a direct answer. >> >> Can you please produce a reproducible example? Meaning a >> (hopefully small) SVG file and the command lines to use. Often >> these types of problems are tied to the values of the width/height >> viewBox attributes on the root SVG element. So without SVG content >> it isn't worth trying to track this down. >> >> Also there was a bug fixed since the 1.6 release in >> this area so you could also try CVS if that is convenient. >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> we use the Batik rasterizer to transform SVG to PNG. >>> >>> Currently we use Batik 1.5.1. Now I tested the new version but with >>> this version the rasterizer doesn't work in the same way as in 1.5.1 >>> >>> With this command >>> >>> java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar -a 20,30,804,516 -bg 255.255.255.255 >>> -indexed 2 -w 1680 P:\0321731.svg >>> >>> we can convert the SVG and the given area of interest is in 1.5.1 >>> extracted as expected. >>> In 1.6 the result of the command is different from 1.5.1. >>> What has changed in 1.6? >>> Why is resulting area of interest in 1.6. greater than in 1.5.1? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
