Re: Antwort: bogus batik source (1.6) distribution? - no way

[Kenneth B. Harwood]

i am/was using the <build.xml> file which came with batik - w/out modification, so i don't know what a "non jdk5 way" might be.   the good news is that i was able to <build batik> by installing/using j2sdk1.4.2_09.  back to the future.   my best clues were the compile errors i was getting on the DOM-related batik files.  many error messages referred to an unimplemented "getUserData" function in the Node interface.  when i looked at the DOM API docs i discovered that "getUserData" is a DOM Level-3 function.     apparently, jdk1.5X uses DOM-3 but batik was coded to DOM-2.   thx.    - ken h.   ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 12:50 AM Subject: Antwort: bogus batik source (1.6) distribution? - no way The batik code is correct ( in this aspect.. ) - there *is* such a constructor in RenderingHints - but with a signature using a generic. Probably you are compiling with a jdk5 compiler in a 'non jdk5 way'... I am not sure that the build.xml as included in the batik-dist is capable of compiling against jdk5 without modifications. dvholten