> Said that (and thinking about it), I'd propose "batik-anim.jar" to be > placed next to "batik-svg-dom.jar" with a double arrow (they depend on > each other), and "batik-coded.jar" below "batik-transcoder.jar" (which > intuitively depends on codec availability). Do agree on this? Is any > tool is used to edit the graph or was it made by hand? (I could try to > create an updated version, at least containing the two missing ones, > until the whole dependency graph is revisited...)
Could anyone more familiar with Batik internals comment on the proposal and/or regarding how was the SVG source generated (tool or by hand? I could then attempt to create 1) a patch to the documentation stating it's outdated (by adding a note, for example) in install page [1] or 2) try to generate an updated SVG image. This would also help fixing bug 44573. :-) Regards, Helder Magalhães [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/install.html [2] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44573 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
