Hi Justin,
Justin Thomas <jus...@brynnandjustin.com> wrote on 03/24/2010 05:09:19 PM:
> I've noticed that Batik claims to support SVG 1.1. However, the
> SVG_SYSTEM_ID and SVG_VERSION constants conform to SVG 1.0 and Batik
> generates the DTD and version parameters in the outputted document
> according to those values. Is that the correct behavior? I'm using
> Batik 1.7 within a Java web application to generate SVG images.
For the purposes of this output it's 1.0 compliant (really SVG 1.1
added modularization and clarifications) so I think it's correct to write
the earliest version of SVG to which the document conforms, don't you
think?
> Also, is there any way to insert ProcessingInstructions in a created
> document to instruct a browser to use a CSS xml-stylesheet? I've
> tried every permutation I can think of to insert the values, and
> Batik seems to just ignore my efforts.
You don't say but I assume you are using the SVGGraphics2D class to
create the SVG? If so you can't create Processing instructions in that
class, but if you retrieve the generated DOM from the SVGGraphics2D
(using getRoot) then you can add ProcessingInstrutions your self and use
the batik.dom.util.DOMUtilities class to output the updated document
(that might also let you change the SYSTEM_ID as well).
