Thanks much Thomas. My apologies for any confusion I may have caused.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:02 AM, <thomas.dewe...@kodak.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > It's now fixed in SVN (rev 946961). > > jonathan wood <jonathanshaww...@gmail.com> wrote on 05/20/2010 10:41:16 > PM: > > > > Very much agreed. I also think I was way off....I missed the close > > () override on the underlying stream. > > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au> > wrote: > > Thomas DeWeese: > > > > Really in my mind the main issue is that you should be able to call > > > > flush whenever you want and not cause real havok which isn't the > > > > case without the proposed patch. > > > jonathan wood: > > > I agree...why the "closed" underlying stream allows modification seems > a bit > > > perverse. > > > I agree with both of those points. The simple fix of not writing a zero > > length IDAT chunk when flush() is called seems best to me. > > > > -- > > Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
