Ok, got that, thx for the help. I will consider modifiying the batik source. I do not get Chris Lilley's answer to the cited post right: Is there a flaw in FireFox (with hope for getting it fixed) or not?
Anyway, the issue is resolved. thank you Detlef Am 18.01.2011 13:12, schrieb Peter Hull: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Peter Hull <peterhul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe a bug in Batik? I have a feeling this has come up before. > Yes, here (26th July 2010) > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-batik-users/201007.mbox/%3c09b23e7bf70425478c1330d893a722c602fed2d...@mailsvr.invera.com%3e > > Pete > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
