Hello, Im not sure how the glyph are embedded in the svg ?! Perhaps you can send an example svg ?!
Mfg Michael Kerschbaum Von: Jared Jurkiewicz (jjurkiew) [mailto:jjurk...@cisco.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2015 15:29 An: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Betreff: Re: Question regarding Batik Transcode of SVG to Image Anyone? I am rather stuck here. Sincerely, -- Jared Jurkiewicz From: Cisco Employee <jjurk...@cisco.com<mailto:jjurk...@cisco.com>> Reply-To: "batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>" <batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:42 AM To: "batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>" <batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>> Subject: Question regarding Batik Transcode of SVG to Image Folks, I have transcoding of SVG -> PNG generally working fine. However, I have encountered an issue where Japanese, Chinese, and Korean (basically any asian language), glyphs do not render correctly. In my browser I see them render fine, but when I send them down into Batik all that comes out are images that have squares where the glyphs should be. I am running batik on a RedHat Enterprise Linux system, and it supposedly does have the xorg misc fonts installed for Japanese, Chinese, and so on. How does Batik decide what glyph to render and insert it? Is it possibly just a an OS missing font issue? Can you give me some guidance on how to proceed in isolating the cause? Sincerely, -- Jared Jurkiewicz
