________________________________ From: Jan Tosovsky <j.tosov...@tiscali.cz> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 7:12 AM To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: SVG rasterizer 1.8 - NoClassDefFoundError when exporting PDF
On 2016-12-09 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2016-12-08 Michael Harris wrote: > > On 2016-12-07 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > > > I've tried to convert my SVG file using Batik rasterizer using the > > > following command, but it ends with NoClassDefFoundError: > > > > > > D:\batik-1.8>java -Xmx512m -jar batik-rasterizer-1.8.jar -m > > > application/pdf horologium.svg > > > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > > > org/apache/batik/dom/svg/SVGDOMImplementation at > > > ... > > > > > > There is a SVGDOMImplementation in 1.8, but for some reason it was > > moved to org.apache.batik.anim.dom. > > > > See: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30092651/where-has-org- [https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/img/apple-touch-i...@2.png?v=73d79a89bded]<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30092651/where-has-org-> Where has org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation gone?<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30092651/where-has-org-> stackoverflow.com In the documentation for batik, it shows how to get an instance of the DOM implementation from the class org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation. However, after downloading Batik 1.8 from th... > apache- > > batik-dom-svg-svgdomimplementation-gone/30250306#30250306 > > Thanks for confirmation. So this change was not apparently propagated > to the PDF rasterizer :-( > To be honest, moving SVG DOM implementation into 'anim' package and moreover 'anim' module is questionable. As a developer I would be surprised by the request to include 'anim' module dependency in case I need to generate PDF even there is no animation in my SVG file. MG>refactoring artifacts to be repackaged into a different package is *supposed to follow spec change* e.g. MG>DOM spec version 4 specified 19 Nov 2015 in https://www.w3.org/TR/dom/ W3C DOM4 - World Wide Web Consortium<https://www.w3.org/TR/dom/> www.w3.org This document was published by the HTML Working Group as a Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document in a manner that is tracked by the W3C ... MG>for any other reason then you as a software professional and apache member should ask why? MG>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1169?jql=project%20%3D%20BATIK <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1169?jql=project%20%3D%20BATIK>MG>please let me know what the response is I'd rather expect to have a separate module svd-dom-impl with this stuff. And for consistency to rename svg-dom to svg-dom-api. Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
