Hi! On 12/28/20 6:31 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Out of curiosity, is there a reason why Bazel is deactivated for so many > architectures? If the build system wants to be popular, it should be > excluding so many architectures. > > It seems you have limited the build to 64-bit architectures.
Aha, guess the package didn't build there [1] and it was just disabled: > https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/commit/3e721adaccea542b8a0b6f16fa779a67dab0a75d Guess you won't get much far with a build system which has such limited portability. But it's Google, I'm not surprised anything outside their own usecase doesn't really work. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
