On Thu Sep 22 2011 Leo wrote: > It makes a different in displaying records. See: > http://i.imgur.com/0NJt1.png > > Another example is one can list all organization-only records > easily.
It seems to me that something like a note field for the predicate `person-p' with values natural, artifical, restaurant, bookstore etc was more to the point here. Then the only thing you need to customize is the function bbdb-display-name-organization. > Note that the added capability to make organisation-only records does > not stop people from using BBDB in the way you describe. I found that part of the problem of the old BBDB code was that it had gained a significant part of its complexity when it implemented solutions in a way that appeared to me not quite to the point. Your patch includes modficiations in various places. And I am quite sure that you'll find more places that need to be patched as time goes by. Whenever it's possible, I'd be glad if such extra complexity can be avoided. Otherwise, in the long run maintenance of BBDB becomes much more difficult. Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
