"Roland Winkler" <wink...@gnu.org> writes: > So far, nobody noticed a bottleneck because of the broken message > cache in BBDB 3. I am tempted to remove this feature altogether... > (better suggestions welcome)
I suggest deleting the cache. Although the caching may have been a good optimization when it was first introduced, things have changed since then. I'd much rather have bbdb work correctly, and be easy to understand/improve, than have it work blazingly fast. > In the meanwhile, I have changed the default value of > bbdb-message-caching to nil. excellent. -- -- Stephe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
