On Sunday, August 5 2001 02:30:59, Ronan Waide wrote:
> I don't know how much duplication of effort - if any - is
> involved in having both systems present.
A few lines. Apparently my commit has broken the old
behavior :/ but I have a fix already handy.
> What I think needs to be done is for bbdb-elided-display
> to go away (or be replaced with some aliasing and a bunch
> of warnings to say it /will/ go away), and be replaced
> with a combination of your code and the elided-display
> functionality under something like bbdb-displayed-fields-*
> and bbdb-one-line-display-*.
>
> Open for discussion, of course.
Your are right, bbdb-one-line-display-* is much better than
*elided*, at least in my eyes. o.k. so how about renaming
the other variables to bbdb-multi-line-display-*?
So how about the following variables which have more
self-explanatory names (the old varnames in parenthesis)
bbdb-default-display-mode (bbdb-elided-display)
either one-line, multi-line or 'full
bbdb-pop-up-default-display-mode (bbdb-pop-up-elided-display)
either one-line, multi-line or 'full
bbdb-one-line-display-fields (bbdb-elided-display-fields)
list of fields which should be displayed in one-line display
bbdb-one-line-display-name-end (bbdb-elided-display-name-end)
column where name and company should end in one-line display
bbdb-multi-line-display-fields (bbdb-display-fields-order)
list of fields displayed in multi-line display.
bbdb-multi-line-display-omit-fields (bbdb-display-omit-fields)
list of fields omitted from multi-line display.
How about theses warnings of name/functionality changes
should they go into the code (warn/compile) or the
documentation?
Ciao
Robert
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
