On August 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Please change the comment, at least :) --- the current CVS Emacs is
I'm pretty sure Dave actually contributed the comment, and I think this amply demonstrates my point about support for CVS Emacs. If this code is actively breaking Emacs 22 then by all means I'll take it out. > Which brings up a related question: can some sort of limited UNDO be > implemented in the .bbdb database (current session only, maybe?). See previous commentary on implementing features - if you want something like this it's best to contribute code. Note that the .bbdb file is a normal emacs file in that it doesn't autosave or anything, so you can always revert to the on-disk version if you screw things up. Cheers, Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. "It's not copying, it's proactive innovation which leverages established interface paradigms." - Mike Cahn ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
