> I thought that would be easier too, but it's counter-intuitive.
It's only counter intuitive if you think of it (and name it) something
like "score". So yes, we need another name to make it less
counter-intuitive. E.g. `completion-penalty'. And I think it would be
good to make it clear that this is for cycling, so the name could be
`completion-cycle-penalty'.
Stefan
! (let ((s1 (get-text-property 0 :completion-score c1))
! (s2 (get-text-property 0 :completion-score c2)))
! (cond ((and s1 s2) (< s1 s2))
! (s1 t)
! (s2 nil)
BTW, I'd rather use something like
! (let ((s1 (get-text-property 0 :completion-score c1))
! (s2 (get-text-property 0 :completion-score c2)))
! (cond ((and s1 s2) (cond ((< s1 s2) t)
! ((> s1 s2) nil)
! (t (< (length c1) (length c2)))))
! (s1 t)
! (s2 nil)
PS: Please Cc the patch to emacs-devel because I don't read this
bbdb-list as regularly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
