On 2011-04-04 10:31 +0800, Matt Lundin wrote: >> When my updates of BBDB were in a pre-alpha stage and I did not yet >> have a detailed roadmap where they would take me, I thought that >> there was really not much of a point trying to continuously (at each >> intermediate stage) preserve backward compatibility when it would >> have been possible. > > I appreciate all the work you have done to freshen up bbdb! > > I, too, have some reservations about the extent of some of the name > changes. For instance, the new bbdb breaks org-mode's bbdb module, which > is part of GNU Emacs.
I personally think it would be far more productive to worry about backward compatibility later on. For example, we could add a new org-bbdb3 module to org mode and leave the old as it is. Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
