Hi Roland,

"Roland Winkler" <wink...@gnu.org> writes:

> On Wed Feb 5 2014 Alan Schmitt wrote:
>> Second, it seems that icicles relies on `bbdb-version' to choose whether
>> to extend bbdb-complete-name or bbdb-complete-mail. However, on my
>> system, bbdb-version returns:
>> 
>> BBDB version @PACKAGE_VERSION@ (@PACKAGE_DATE@)
>> 
>> which is not helpful at all. Is it a problem from melpa?
>
> Yes, this is a problem of Melpa.

I have to admit I've been spoiled by how easy it is to install packages
using Melpa.

I assume you're not the person who put bbdb on Melpa, and that I should
file a bug there. Is this correct?

> If you wait a few more days, BBDB 3.1 will be released. Then it will
> be easier to properly install BBDB then right now when you need a
> rather recent installation of autotools for this.

Great. I'll try again then.

Thanks,

Alan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to