@bruce @ronald: Noted!
good points both and Ill have to start using the forward lookup.
Good stuff, and Ill give it a go!
cheers.bo
On May 10, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:25PM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
>> I thought I had gotten it to ignore those words. so anything that looked
>> like
>> :link || :active etc ignore those lines.
>
> Okay, you could do something like this:
>
> #! /usr/bin/perl
>
> use strict;
> use warnings;
>
> while (<>){
> s/^([-a-z ]+:)(?!link|visited|hover|active)\s*(.+)/sprintf("%-20s",$1) .
> "$2"/ie;
> print;
> }
>
> (?!...) is a negative-lookahead assertion. It makes sure the sub-pattern
> doesn't match at that point in the string, without consuming any of the
> string.
>
>
> However, if you can assume that a :selector will always be followed by a {
> on the same line, then this might be better:
>
> while (<>){
> s/^([-a-z ]+:)\s*([^\{]+)$/sprintf("%-20s",$1) . "$2"/ie;
> print;
> }
>
>
> Ronald
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
> please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
