On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT), Matias Bjarland <[email protected]> wrote:
>While on the subject of TextMate vs BBedit. I did a quick comparison on >opening a large number of small files. I did a: > >> find . -type f -name MANIFEST.MF > list.txt > >and > >> cat list.txt | xargs bbedit >> cat list.txt | xargs mate > >In BBedit this took about 35 seconds. In TextMate about one second. You should have ran the test a second time. The first time you ran the bbedit command all the files were read from disk. The second time when you ran textmate all the files were read from system cache memory. You should have ran the bbedit command a second time to see what difference, if any, there was. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
