RobS wrote:
I'd love to believe, really I would. But I used to believe in XHTML and before that, the tooth fairy. If the things that LESS provides -- which look delightful, I should say -- are valuable to enough people, they'll end up in CSS eventually. (Yes, I guess I still believe in the tooth fairy.)
Less is a perfectly fine thing conceptually, but the cool kids have already abandoned it for SASS. Wait, that was at least six months ago! It's SCSS now, baby.

(I used to want to a LESS module back when I was using another editor that--at that point in time--didn't have one, but I realized that by simply telling the editor that ".less" was another extension that could be used for CSS, I got 90% of what I wanted. Then I realized that by using LESS, I was no longer able to use CSSEdit and its awesome powers of awesomeness. So I stopped using LESS.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Reply via email to