On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Gribnif <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's because I went with BBEdit's default "loose.dtd"? That happens to be the exact DTD I was already using on that page. BTW, if I remove the entire block of link code, the page validates fine, so it's probably not some kind of weird cascade thing either. So why are you getting a different result from me? Two possibilities come to mind... - What version of BBEdit are you using? 10.x? Might it have a more sophisticated validator than the version 9.6.3 I'm using? - Some obscure configuration option? I just tried unchecking *everything* in the BBEdit Preferences "HTML Tools" section... I unchecked *all* the "Generate syntax checker warnings for:" and "Generate link checker warnings for:" checkboxes to make it as liberal as possible. (I had them all checked before.) It made no difference: your code block still generated the same error as before. So did my code block, for that matter, although they're different errors. So the obvious Prefs seem to make no difference... that's why I'm wondering if it's configurable by some obscure config option or something. Quite mysterious. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
