> On 28 Feb 2015, at 18:58, Jared Roller <simonat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Maarten. I can't be 100% sure, but I think this feature lacks any > 'replace' option, or the ability to snag the \1, \2,\3 subpatterns. But maybe > extraction would be nice to add to 'process' instead of find and replace. > That would seem to make more sense.
Process lines containing can send the matching lines to a new document. You can use grep for the pattern, but indeed not copy specific subpatterns. I was mistaken, the ‘Process duplicate lines’ does accept subpatterns. Time for a feature request, I think. > My thoughts are you couldn't pull this off without using some kind of > extraction. Basically, the extraction feature shows some opportunity with > grep to map sections of data, format and copy the result to a new file. :) You can of course use a two-stage process: Modify first to get related information on a single line, then copy to a new file, and finally remove what is not needed. OK, that can be improved. Maarten -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.
