Thank you solak, that's exactly the issue. We found about it when I was exploring ways to fix an "open text path with emacs" kind of service, at the same time as I noticed the equivalent service in BBEdit was not working as expected. Interesting how fixing a seemingly small issue can lead to finding deep implementation bugs...
Jean-Christophe > On May 18, 2017, at 3:17, solak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, it is definitely the case that if the pattern in question is then > concatenated into a more complex pattern, then '[ab]' is equivalent to > '(a|b)' but not to 'a|b'. > > Consider that the function to which the pattern is given might then be > searching for, something like '^(?:(.*?)[ab])*(.*)$' or '^(?:(.*?)a|b)*(.*)$' > to populate \1 \2 … with the various substrings of the long string with > delimiters. > > I suggest that this indicates a bug in the split-string function, which ought > to wrap the delimiter pattern so that it tells the RE engine to match > '^(?:(.*?)(?:a|b))*(.*)$' instead. -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
