For years, I’ve been using persistent includes (<!— #bbinclude …. >) that contain plain includes (#bbinclude …). This always works just as I want: The persistent include body is inserted in the document, and then the #bbincludes in the inserted text are recursively substituted.
In other places I’ve used included scripts (persistent includes that include an AppleScript, Perl, or Swift script that generates he included text. This also works perfectly. But I just tried replacing a persistent include whose body text contains #bbinclude’s with an included script that generates exactly the same body text, AND THE NESTED #BBINCLUDE’s AREN’T SUBSTITUTED. Does anybody else have any experience with this phenomenon. I hope I’m just doing something wrong; it would be disappointing if this doesn’t work. Regards, Neil Faiman -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
