On 04/16/2018, at 01:59, F. Alfredo Rego <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I’m almost there, but not quite, because I’m interested in the UNCOMMENTED > #defines, such as line 5 here:
Hey Alfredo, What you really want here is a negative lookahead assertion. ^(?>(?:(?!//).)*#define.+) It's much more flexible than a negative lookbehind assertion, although it can be a bit hard to understand. -- Best Regards, Chris -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
