On Jun 22, 2019, at 18:41, Christopher Stone <listmeis...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> 
> On 06/22/2019, at 14:15, Patrick Woolsey <pwool...@barebones.com> wrote:
>> Based on your description above, I expect something like this should do the 
>> job, or at least serve as a starting point for further experimentation :-):
>> 
>> Search for:    (( |)if \(.+?!=.+?$)
> 
> Hey Patrick,
> 
> I expect I'd normally write that like this:
> 
> (\h?if \(.+?!=.+?$)
> 
> Is there any advantage to “( |)” other than being readable?

None of which I'm aware; that was mainly reflexive on my part. :-)


Regards,

 Patrick Woolsey
==
Bare Bones Software, Inc.             <https://www.barebones.com/>

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a 
feature request or need technical support, please email
"supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <https://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bbedit/46440C81-B465-49FC-A977-390176DD4B89%40barebones.com.

Reply via email to