There seems to be a limitation of BBEdit persistent includes that I haven't  
been able to find a way around. I wonder if anyone else has hit this wall, and 
if so, if you've gotten past it.

Here is a web page in my site (in its entirety):

<!-- #bbinclude "Case Index Page" #SORT_BY#="Date" -->
<!-- end bbinclude -->

The "Case Index Page" include file contains this:

<!-- #bbinclude "case_index.swift" #SORT_BY_CI#="#SORT_BY#" -->
<!-- end bbinclude -->

The nested include includes a script whose behavior depends on the value of its 
#SORT_BY_CI# parameter. I was expecting that BBEdit would substitute the value, 
"Date", for the reference "#SORT_BY#" in the nested include, so that 
case_index.swift would see "Date" as the value of #SORT_BY_CI#.

But apparently BBEdit does parameter substitution on the expansion of the 
nested include, not on the include itself. Thus, the included script sees the 
value of its #SORT_BY_CI# parameter as the string "#SORT_BY#".

In short, where a persistent-included text file contains a persistent includes 
of a script, there doesn't seem to be any way to make the behavior of the 
script depend on the parameters to the include of the text file.

Am I missing something?

Thanks,

        Neil Faiman

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request 
or need technical support, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than 
posting here. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <https://twitter.com/bbedit>
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bbedit/61EF0A60-CE5C-4C86-941A-1AC031AECF63%40faiman.org.

Reply via email to