On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 07:59:07PM -0500, A Page in the Life of ... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:
> Ahh Tabor I always knew I could count on you. heh > There is one message, on the 18th of November from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that > was rejected on a failed verify: > > 2003-11-18 20:40:32 verify failed for SMTP recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] > from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> H=sc002pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.146]: 1 Time(s) > > Does that mean, that, becuase it was rejected, I'm never going to get on > their whitelist? Hrm ... the members of the wearables mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] who have verizon accounts are not going to be pleased. > *sigh* No. They happen more frequently. It looks like they've changed the envelope-from to be the more proper "<>". I'm not sure when they made that change. Just check for connections from those hosts. > Which, according to Verizon was the problem that NM mentioned, that if > there isn't a valid MX and PTR record for your machine, you are not > accepted. Also if they do a RCPT TO:<yoursenderaddress> and get a failure, they'll fail the incoming connection. > engineering to try and get through to someone who could even talk to me > without giving them a DSL account phone number. *sigh* I don't recommend > it to anyone, even Sysuphus admirer. "Please escalate this call to your shift supervisor" is a phrase I use frequently when dealing with tech support like this. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tabor J. Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fsck It! Just another victim of the ambient morality _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
