I hope your using some sort of token based auth then, because a keyboard sniffer will ruin all of that.
-miah On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:14:09AM -0500, A Page in the Life of ... wrote: > I think, with all due respect to the arguement, that BOTH should be the > answer. > > Having both a crunchy outside AND a crunchy center should be the call of > the day. > > You also should encrypt all your traffic. SSH to other machines, mail > should be using STARTLS, both for authenticaton, and to encrypt content. > IM traffic should be encrypted end-to-end, CVS should be used to share > documents, and done over SSH, et al. > > The less there is to sniff, and the less there is unauthenticated, the less > there is for the virus folks to play with. If you have suspenders and a > belt, it takes a much more traumatic event to pants you. > > -dkap > > P.S. There are two levels of paranoia. Complete, and insufficient. > > > _______________________________________________ > bblisa mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa > _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
