Why do you want to run these things on nonstandard ports? What is the goal to this?
-miah On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Eric J. Hansen wrote: > We're looking at setting up a special website on alternate TCP ports > such as 8080 and 40443 (i.e., http://www.mysite.com:8080). This would be > accessible by the Internet at large, and ideally as many end users as > possible. My question to the group has to do with corporate and/or personal > firewalls -- namely, do you think these (or similar non-standard) ports are > likely to be blocked so end users can't browse to these URL's? > > I looked through some docs about the Microsoft XP personal firewall as > well as ZoneAlarm, but couldn't find a definitive list of what outbound > TCP ports would be allowed (not cause an alert/pop-up.) > > thanks > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > bblisa mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa > _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list [email protected] http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
