> Or a response from a BCEL developer to indicate what BCEL offers that > ASM lacks would be useful...
FWIW, I looked at ASM a few months ago to see if I wanted to migrate to it and decided it didn't have the features I needed. I think, at the time, I compared the two to the difference between SAX and DOM. Sometimes you can do what you want with SAX, and it's faster. But sometimes, you really need DOM and are willing to pay for it. I'm in (and will always be in, with our problemspace) the latter camp, as far as bytecode transformation goes. - Paul
