> I like it, a bold statement :) > > So, questions to the BCEL community.
...the point is - there is only a *very* small developer community but a large user community I think the guys left over on bcel-dev are more here for maintenance than development. > 1) Does BCEL have use-cases over ASM? I think Eugene's statement is a > healthy, competitive one and it'd be good to hear if there's > disagreement. I haven't explored all areas with ASM yet. ...but for the ones I touched it felt quick and easy to use. Especially with the great eclipse view. One thing I really dislike though was the heavy use of strings on the API. > 2) If Eugene is right, > > a) are there features in the planning to give BCEL a use-case? I've changed the javaflow API so it's now easy to hook in an ASM implementation of the bytecode rewriting. This will be my use-case for comparison. I can probably say more after that's done. > b) should the focus be on fixing bugs for existing users instead of > adding features that ASM has already. Yepp ...I think that's the way to go for now. cheers -- Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
