> Given the nearly universal opinion expressed in the recent email thread > titled "comparison between BCEL and ASM": > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bcel-dev&m=111149200909727&w=2 > I think it would be a good idea to update the BCEL welcome page to note > that while BCEL will continue to be maintained, new users are encouraged > to use ASM.
...only bugfixing the last release? > Are there any objections to me doing this? If I don't hear any within > the next 3 days I will make this change to the website. Hm... that's quite a big thing. We should do a vote on that. Maybe it would be worth also asking on bcel-user what they think about that. I personally would like to play a bit with ASM before casting my vote. cheers -- Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
