DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35405>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35405 Summary: Branch target offset too large for short Product: BCEL Version: 5.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: Main AssignedTo: bcel-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are using bcel library for code generation. And for some particualr scenarios our method size is exceeding the method size limit defined by java (65535 bytes) and we get the following error, org.apache.bcel.generic.ClassGenException: Branch target offset too large for short at org.apache.bcel.generic.BranchInstruction.dump(BranchInstruction.java:100) at org.apache.bcel.generic.InstructionList.getByteCode(InstructionList.java:980) at org.apache.bcel.generic.MethodGen.getMethod(MethodGen.java:616) When the method size limit is defined in java as 65535, why does the BCEL gives an error for 32767, in org.apache.bcel.generic.BranchInstruction.dump(DataOutputStream out) the check is for, if(Math.abs(index) >= 32767) // too large for short throw new ClassGenException("Branch target offset too large for short"); why not instead have the if(Math.abs(index) >= 65535) I tried this and then my application works fine, I want to be sure if thats the right approach. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]