When I look at the byte codes produced by the code snip:
try {
<try stuff here>
}
catch (Exception e) {
<catch stuff here>
throw e;
}
finally {
<finally stuff here>
}
My complier (JIKES) generates an internal catch in order to do a jsr to the
finally clause.
When the BCEL code dumps the exception handler(s) table it looks like this:
Exception handler(s) =
>From To Handler Type
0 8 14 java.lang.Exception(8)
0 23 29 <Any exception>(0)
When I try to add a "master" try catch around code that I am instrumenting I
would like to use the <Any exception>(0) ObjectType, but, so far, the best I
have been able to do is to use the Type.THROWABLE which ends up looking like
this:
Exception handler(s) =
>From To Handler Type
7 15 21 java.lang.Exception(8)
7 30 36 <Any exception>(0)
0 60 61 java.lang.Throwable(66)
My first question is this: Can I (or How do I) create the ObjectType which
would give me the <Any exception>(0) ObjectType?
My second question is this: Would there be any real difference between the
ObjectType <Any exception>(0) and the ObjectType java.lang.Throwable(66)
Thanks in advance for you help in this matter.
rm -rf /bin/laden/������
Burt Wagner, Senior Software Engineer
NPULSE Software, Inc. at Hotbank
100 Superior Plaza Way, Suite 200
Superior, Colorado 80027
Work: (303) 642-4457 WFax: (303) 642-4002
Home: (303) 417-0493 HFax: (303) 417-0494
Cell: (303) 589-3095
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
